Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900H is 2016 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
- Performs up to 9% better in Sea of Thieves than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 240 vs 220 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Mobile • Mar 16th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Renoir | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |