Buy on Amazon
€20.54
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 30% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G3930T - 150 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
115
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Matisse | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
