Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 1492 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 15% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 192 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€269.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €269.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1653 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
66.78944137507673%
Multi-Core
3898
50.73538982168424%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Renoir | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |