Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 6800H outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 6800H is 2690 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
- Performs up to 8% better in God of War than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rembrandt | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |