Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 1892 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 26% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-6300 - 219 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 25% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - €123.26 vs €165.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 5800X - €0.71 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €165 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9800 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
174
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€123.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €123.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9799 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |