Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2935 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6300 - 217 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - €49.68 vs €165.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 5800X - €0.26 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €165 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2031 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2030 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |