Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800H outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800H is 3572 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E3-1240 - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 45 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 5800H
Mobile • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1240 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Cezanne | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 80 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
