Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 31% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 207 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - €53.91 vs €155.59
- Up to 55% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 7 5700X - €0.34 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €155.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
158
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |