Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800HS is 643 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 132 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
118
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10281 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |