Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2864 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-3240T - 138 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
25.426621160409557%
Multi-Core
971
11.449121565853083%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
