Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €347.49 vs €2846.24
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €1.39 vs €11.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 3700X - 258 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 64 vs 16 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
250
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€347.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €347.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.03/FPS
12%
Price, €
€2846.24
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |