Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 742 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Ryzen 7 2700 - 201 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - €93.16 vs €261.39
- Up to 65% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 7 2700 - €0.46 vs €1.33 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €93.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 625 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |