Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 782 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €54.91 vs €496.71
- Up to 87% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-9700F - €0.11 vs €0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 11% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 1700X - 576 vs 519 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
519
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
576
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
12%
Price, €
€496.71
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |