Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3924 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 68% better in Rust than FX-8320 - 258 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€228.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €228.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jul 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Not Available | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |