Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3471 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8120 - 213 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €162.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |