Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3471 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 116 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - €18.79 vs €162.76
- Up to 85% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 5600G - €0.21 vs €1.4 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €162.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €18.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Cezanne | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |