Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 115 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 184 vs 179 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |