Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 750 days newer than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 159 vs 150 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 4600HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i3-12100F
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Renoir | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
