Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 258 days older than Ryzen 5 4600H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Ryzen 5 4600H - 724 vs 714 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Ryzen 5 4600H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
