Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 174 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 87 vs 95 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 14th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 87 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |