Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 75 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-9100F - 229 vs 225 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
83.67844092570037%
Multi-Core
3669
52.41428571428571%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
