Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €82.84 vs €370.47
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900 - €0.44 vs €1.92 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
98.44559585492227%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
22.916666666666668%
Price, €
€370.47
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €370.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1597
93.7206572769953%
Multi-Core
6884
81.74801092506829%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |