Buy on Amazon
€270.82
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 480 days newer than Ryzen 5 3550H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen 5 3550H - 257 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3550H - 20 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
257
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €270.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
