Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3500X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 219 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €231.18 vs €292.53
- Up to 20% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900KF - €1.36 vs €1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 3500X - 173 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 20 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
170
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
80%
Price, €
€292.53
79%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 24th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |