Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - €37.92 vs €88.16
- Up to 57% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 5 3400G - €0.19 vs €0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €88.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |