Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €133.12 vs €560.0
- Up to 67% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900F - €0.71 vs €2.18 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 37% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 2600X - 257 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
188
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16070 minutes ago
Buy for €560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |