Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1449 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 3% better in FIFA 23 than Core i5-4690 - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €51.13 vs €133.12
- Up to 61% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.35 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
39%
Price, €
€133.12
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6206 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
145
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |