Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 167 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €231.39 vs €399.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.15 vs €1.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 0% better in The Outer Worlds than Ryzen 5 2600X - 203 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
202
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €231.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.97/FPS
58%
Price, €
€399.99
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |