Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 252 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€133.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €133.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |