Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1319 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 6% better in League of Legends than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 140 vs 132 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €152.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |