Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Ryzen 5 2500X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1577 days newer than Ryzen 5 2500X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 55% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 2500X - 82 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€9.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€799
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Single-Core
1103
39.085754783841246%
Multi-Core
3801
21.746095314377254%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |