Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1688 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €74.94 vs €530.38
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900K - €0.32 vs €2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 263 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
237
90.11406844106465%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
15.841584158415841%
Price, €
€530.38
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €530.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
35.5413584398117%
Multi-Core
3294
16.349017272185826%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |