Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 356 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - €81.22 vs €235.49
- Up to 65% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-8700T - €0.47 vs €1.33 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 5 1600X - 177 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
174
98.30508474576271%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
35.338345864661655%
Price, €
€235.49
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €235.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |