Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €191.69 vs €528.76
- Up to 59% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i9-13900K - €0.63 vs €1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 344 vs 305 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
305
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
344
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
40%
Price, €
€528.76
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |