Buy on Amazon
€191.69
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2284 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-2400S - 173 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €69.9 vs €191.69
- Up to 59% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.45 vs €1.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD CPU Ryzen 5 1600 AM4
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
156
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Sockel 1155 Core-i5 Prozessor (2500MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
