Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 540 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €191.69 vs €399.99
- Up to 50% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.57 vs €1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 348 vs 339 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
339
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
348
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
49%
Price, €
€399.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |