Buy on Amazon
€167.49
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €167.49 vs €199.5
- Up to 11% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-10320 - €0.85 vs €0.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 1400 - 207 vs 198 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
198
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.49
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 Prozessor
Buy for €167.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12819 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12817 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 5 1400
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
