Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 827 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 23% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 238 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Single-Core
1102
50.29666818804199%
Multi-Core
3078
34.54545454545455%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |