Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 1000 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
55.172413793103445%
Multi-Core
1043
33.8856400259909%
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
