Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is 2492 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G1610 - 201 vs 194 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Desktop • Sep 30th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Not Available | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
