Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4300U is 3008 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8120 - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4300U - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 3 4300U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Renoir | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Graphics 320SP | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
