Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 1040 days older than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Ryzen 3 3250U - 269 vs 260 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Picasso | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |