Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €63.08 vs €2846.24
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Ryzen 3 3200G - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 64 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77131 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2846.24
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
63.56495468277945%
Multi-Core
3013
20.66671239454009%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |