Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 277 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €67.0 vs €399.99
- Up to 82% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.26 vs €7.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 56 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.14/FPS
17%
Price, €
€399.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |