Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 6 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €176.43 vs €314.9
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-10900F - €0.25 vs €0.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Ryzen 3 3100 - 736 vs 713 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
713
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€176.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €176.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15332 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
736
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
58%
Price, €
€314.9
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €314.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15331 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |