Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200U is 2156 days newer than Core i7-3820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
- Performs up to 5% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3820 - 145 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200U - 8 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 3 2200U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2018
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
