Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - €78.73 vs €570.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-10900 - €0.4 vs €2.68 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 3 2200G - 213 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
199
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Buy for €570 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |