Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 622 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €74.85 vs €127.21
- Up to 40% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-6800K - €0.44 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 3 2200G - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
171
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18178 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
60%
Price, €
€127.21
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €127.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |