Buy on Amazon
€74.95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 895 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €74.95 vs €133.41
- Up to 40% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6700T - €0.15 vs €0.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 2200G - 531 vs 508 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
508
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.95
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen TM 3 2200G mit RadeonTM VegaTM Grafikkarte
Buy for €74.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-6700T 2,8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €133.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 215 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
