Buy on Amazon
€75.65
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1008 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €75.65 vs €264.87
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 12% better in New World than Ryzen 3 1300X - 121 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 20 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
LANCHY AMD Ryzen 3 1300X CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 65W Sockel AM4
Buy for €75.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75786 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €264.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
1097
65.45346062052506%
Multi-Core
3157
37.467362924281986%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
